Clinical Research Library
What does the published research say about PEMF and bioregulation?
This library holds 50 published studies across 16 clinical categories, each graded A through F on a published scale, with Review and Ongoing Trial as separate labels. Negative and preclinical findings are listed alongside positive ones. No category currently holds an A grade.
Last reviewed 2026-08-27. Read the grading methodology.
How can I filter these studies?
By category
Showing 3 of 50 studies. Clear all filters
| Category | Study | Grade | Design | Population | Year | Link |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuropathic Pain | PEMF for Neuropathic Pain: Meta-Analysis (NEGATIVE) | D | Meta-analysis | 688 patients across 13 RCTs | 2026 | PubMed 41745713 |
| Neuropathic Pain | PEMF for Neuropathic Pain: RCT | C+ | Randomized controlled trial | 182 patients | 2023 | PubMed 37542366 |
| Neuropathic Pain | PEMF for Diabetic Neuropathy: RCT (NEGATIVE) | D | Randomized controlled trial | 225 patients | 2009 | PubMed 19577022 |
A positive PEMF study is not evidence for a specific device unless the signal parameters studied are reasonably comparable to what that device produces. Read the methodology and its stated limitations before drawing conclusions from any single row above.
Continue
How the library is built, and where to go next.