Autism Spectrum

    Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for ASD: Meta-Analysis

    Grade B-Systematic review and meta-analysis

    What did this study find?

    This meta-analysis pooled twenty-two references covering 829 participants who received non-invasive brain stimulation for autism spectrum disorder. Pooled results favored the intervention for repetitive behaviors, cognitive function and executive function. The included studies used stimulation methods stronger than consumer PEMF, and outcome measures varied considerably between them.

    What are the details of this record?

    Full citation
    Non-invasive brain stimulation for patient with autism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PMC. 2023.
    Study design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sample size and population
    829 participants across 22 studies
    Evidence grade
    Grade B- on the BioReg grading scale
    Reported findings
    Meta-analysis of 22 references (829 participants). NIBS showed positive effects on repetitive behaviors, cognitive function, and executive function in autistic patients.
    DOI
    No DOI recorded
    PubMed
    Not indexed in PubMed

    A positive PEMF study is not evidence for a specific device unless the signal parameters studied, frequency, intensity, waveform, and exposure duration, are reasonably comparable to what that device produces. Where this record does not list those parameters, the source report did not publish them. See the grading methodology. Library last reviewed 2026-08-27.