BioReg vs BEMER: Specification Comparison
BioReg builds PEMF and bioregulation systems spanning home use to a closed-loop clinical flagship. BEMER builds the Evo physical vascular therapy system, a controller with full-body and local applicators. The clearest architectural difference: the BioReg CellCom measures the user during a session; BEMER publishes no input or feedback mechanism.
Competitor specifications sourced from manufacturer published materials, verified August 2026.
What does each company make?
BioReg
BioReg Technologies builds PEMF and bioregulation systems across six devices, from the Nesta Child home unit through the SanoCenter multi-station clinic platform and the CellCom flagship, which adds closed-loop body biofeedback. Prices run $1,495 to $28,995. BioReg product line
BEMER
BEMER Int. AG builds the BEMER Evo physical vascular therapy system: a B.Box Evo controller that drives full-body applicators (B.Body, B.Bed), local applicators (B.Pad, B.Spot, B.Sit) and light therapy modules (B.Light). Two applicators can operate in parallel. The system is intended for end users aged 14 and older and for medically trained personnel.
Source: BEMER Therapy System Evo, Instructions for UseHow do the published specifications compare?
Every BEMER cell is cited to BEMER's own published material. Where BEMER does not publish a figure, the cell reads "Not published."
| Specification | BEMER Evo | BioReg device line |
|---|---|---|
| Field intensity, local applicator | Approximately 100 µT at maximum level; approximately 150 µT with the Plus signal (B.Pad, B.Spot and B.Sit Evo applicators). Source: BEMER Therapy System Evo, Instructions for Use | 100+ µT across the line. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Field intensity, full-body applicator | Approximately 35 µT at maximum level; approximately 50 µT with the Plus signal (B.Body and B.Bed Evo applicators). Source: BEMER Therapy System Evo, Instructions for Use | 100+ µT across the line. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Frequency range | Not published. | 0.5 Hz to 30 Hz (Nesta Pro), 1 Hz to 200 kHz (SanoCenter), 1 Hz to 1 MHz (CellCom). Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Closed-loop biofeedback | Not published. | CellCom only: closed loop, two dedicated input channels adjust output during the session. All other BioReg devices are open loop. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Programs | Three preset programs, P1 (8 minutes), P2 (16 minutes) and P3 (20 minutes), plus a sleep program; via the expert mode editor, three custom programs (E1 to E3) can be created by the user. Source: BEMER Therapy System Evo, Instructions for Use | 6 to 553 programs by device. Practitioner-editable on Nesta Pro, SanoCenter and CellCom; preset on the home line. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Applicator types | B.Body Evo and B.Bed Evo full-body applicators; B.Pad, B.Spot and B.Sit Evo local applicators; B.Light Evo light therapy modules. Source: BEMER Therapy System Evo, Instructions for Use | Lanyard and medium or XL PEMF pads, by configuration. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Intended user | End users aged 14 years and older, as well as medically trained personnel. Source: BEMER Therapy System Evo, Instructions for Use | Families and home users through licensed practitioners and multi-station clinics, by device. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Price | B.Box Evo standalone $3,990; B.Box sets $4,590 to $5,890 (US webshop). Source: BEMER US webshop, Evo line | $1,495 to $28,995 across the line. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Warranty | Three years automatic on BEMER products; six months for B.Light modules and the rechargeable battery. Manufacturer defects. Source: BEMER Returns and Warranty Policy | 2 years device, 1 year accessories, manufacturing defects. Nesta Pro Premium: 5 years device and accessories. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
| Training included | Not published. | Training video plus 15 minute consult on home devices; onboarding video plus 1 hour live consult on Nesta Pro; white glove training on SanoCenter and CellCom. Source: BioReg specification matrix |
Note on local applicators: BioReg and BEMER local applicators operate in a comparable intensity range. BEMER publishes approximately 100 µT at maximum level (approximately 150 µT with the Plus signal) for its local applicators; BioReg publishes 100+ µT.
What is the architectural difference?
The BioReg CellCom uses two dedicated input channels that obtain information from the user and adjust output frequency in response during a session. This is a closed-loop system. BEMER does not publish a comparable input or feedback mechanism, and operates as an open-loop system that delivers a preset output.
The BioReg Nesta line is open-loop and performs no physiological measurement.
How do the intensity classes differ?
On published figures, the two lines overlap at the local applicator: BEMER publishes approximately 100 µT at maximum level for the B.Pad, B.Spot and B.Sit Evo, and BioReg publishes 100+ µT across its line. They differ at the full-body applicator, where BEMER publishes approximately 35 µT at maximum level (approximately 50 µT with the Plus signal) for the B.Body and B.Bed Evo.
Intensity is one design variable among several. Published PEMF research spans a wide intensity range, and neither figure on its own describes what a session does.
What does the published evidence say?
The BioReg research library holds 50 peer-reviewed studies, each graded on an A through F scale for design and sample quality, organized by condition with citations. Browse the research library or read how studies are graded. This page does not characterize BEMER's evidence base; BEMER's own site describes its research position.
Which should you consider?
Based on published positioning, the BEMER Evo is designed for home users and medically trained personnel who want a preset-program system with a sleep program and optional light therapy modules, sold through BEMER's webshop and distributor network.
The BioReg line is designed for buyers who want to choose by use case: home units with preset or buyer-selected protocols, a practitioner system with editable programs, a multi-station clinic platform, and a closed-loop flagship for practices that want physiological measurement during the session.
Neither company's published material supports a clinical superiority claim in either direction, and this page makes none.